Editorial policy
Clear information, careful attributionThis policy explains how we create compassionate educational content, separate facts from individual guidance, and identify authorship and delegated clinical approval accurately.
Contact us
Why Women’s Recovery publishes health information
Our recovery resources and mental health information help women and families understand substance use, mental health, treatment options, and when individual guidance matters.
Health information can feel impersonal or overwhelming, especially when you are trying to make sense of several concerns at once. We use clear language, define unfamiliar terms, answer the subject directly, and make room for uncertainty without pressuring you toward a decision.
Educational content cannot diagnose a condition, determine safety, confirm treatment fit, or replace an assessment. When a question depends on current symptoms, recent substance use, medication, pregnancy, physical health, or immediate risk, the page should say that individual guidance is needed.
How authorship and content approval are shown
You can learn about the site’s named contributor on the Tim Francis author page and understand the people behind care through the Women’s Recovery staff directory.
Blog articles display “Created by Tim Francis, SUD and Mental Health Content Specialist.” That credit describes responsibility for creating and maintaining the site’s educational content. It does not present him as a treating clinician or imply that a general article is an individual recommendation.
Clinical credit and approval language in this draft are pending exact-content review. No draft page should be read as clinically approved.
Program and health pages in this review build are drafts. Attribution and approval credits will be checked against the exact final content before release.
Staff names, roles, credentials, and biographies come from Women’s Recovery’s published information. The staff directory helps visitors understand the team, but it does not promise that a specific person will be assigned, available, or involved in a particular service.
How evidence and service facts are handled
Clinical education follows the standards on our health information sources page, while admissions can explain current program details directly.
We prefer primary government health agencies, established clinical guidance, and organizations responsible for the information being summarized. Sources are chosen for the specific topic rather than added as decoration. They support general education and do not prove that every service described elsewhere is currently available.
Approval evidence must be tied to the exact final content before release. This review build has not completed that step.
Program schedules, admission criteria, insurance participation, staff availability, and service locations can change. We separate those facts from broader education, and Women’s Recovery confirms time-sensitive details directly. Its published physical location is 3801 E Florida Ave, Ste 650, Denver, CO 80210.
How automation supports the editorial process
Our automated quality controls apply the standards on the health information sources page and the medical review policy without replacing the people responsible for approval.
Some drafting, structuring, inventory, and quality-control tasks use automated tools, including AI-assisted workflows. Source selection, factual constraints, attribution, independent rendered-page review, and final release decisions remain separately governed steps.
Automation does not mean Amanda Miller or another staff member personally reviewed a page. A named personal review is displayed only when a separate record binds that person’s decision to the exact page version. The general clinical approval label describes delegated authority and does not make that individual-review claim.
A generated draft is not approved simply because it exists or passes an automated check. The final rendered page must match its evidence and review records, and later changes invalidate those earlier hash-bound records until the review and release gates run again.
Updates, corrections, and questions from readers
If you notice something that may need attention, use the contact page or begin with the frequently asked questions to tell us what you found.
A useful correction identifies the page, the statement in question, and the source or current fact that may change it. We review substantive concerns against the page’s supporting information and the most reliable available source. A correction should improve clarity without hiding what remains uncertain.
Publication and update dates are shown on blog articles when that information is available from the original site. A newer date does not by itself prove personal review by the Clinical Director. Delegated approval, final content sealing, and any separately documented personal review remain distinct records.
- We do not promise outcomes or use a diagnosis as a marketing claim.
- Urgent safety information is separated from routine admissions guidance.
- Approval credits remain pending until the exact final content is reviewed.
If you can't believe that yet, borrow my hope. Just long enough to find your own.
Women’s Recovery graduate